Latest Papers

ASME Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics

  • Theoretical Analysis of Workspace of a Hybrid Offset Joint
    on December 19, 2024 at 12:00 am

    AbstractOffset joints are widely used in robotics, and literature has demonstrated that axial offset joints can expand the workspace. However, the hybrid offset joint, which incorporates offsets in three orthogonal directions (x, y, and z axes), provides a more flexible and comprehensive range of motion compared to traditional axial offset joints. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the workspace of hybrid offset joints with three-directional offsets is essential. First, through a parameter model, the interference motion of hybrid offset joints is studied, considering three different directional offsets and obtaining analytical expressions. Next, based on coordinate transformations, the workspace of this joint is investigated, resulting in corresponding theoretical formulas. In addition, the influence of offset amounts in various directions on the joint’s workspace is examined. Finally, the application of hybrid offset joints in parallel manipulators (PMs) is introduced, highlighting their practical engineering value. Through comparative analysis, it is found that lateral offsets on the x- and y-axes adjust the maximum rotation angles, while the z-axis offset expands the rotational range of these joints. Moreover, by increasing the limit rotation angle of the passive joint in a specific direction, the application of hybrid offset joints in PMs can impact the workspace. These findings offer valuable insights for the design of hybrid offset joints and their applications in robotics.

  • A Novel Delta-Like Parallel Robot With Three Translations and Two Pitch Rotations for Peg-in-Hole Assembly
    on December 19, 2024 at 12:00 am

    AbstractThis paper presents a novel 5-degree-of-freedom (5-DOF) delta-like parallel robot named the double-pitch-delta robot, which can output three translations and two pitch rotations for peg-in-hole assembly. First, the kinematic mechanism of the new robot is designed based on the DOF requirements. Second, the closed-form kinematic model of the double-pitch-delta robot is established. Finally, the workspace of the double-pitch-delta robot is quantitatively analyzed, and a physical prototype of the new robot is developed to verify the effectiveness of the designed mechanism and the established models. Compared with the existing 5-DOF parallel robots with two pitch rotations, the double-pitch-delta robot has a simpler forward displacement model, larger workspace, and fewer singular loci. The double-pitch-delta robot can be also extended as a 6-DOF hybrid robot with the full-cycle tool-axis rotation to satisfy more complex operations. With these benefits, the new robot has a promising prospect in assembly applications.

Comparison of Under-Actuated and Fully Actuated Serial Robotic Arms: A Case Study

Abstract

Under-actuated robots are very interesting in terms of cost and weight since they can result in a state-controllable system with a number of actuators lower than the number of joints. In this paper, a comparison between an under-actuated planar three-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) robot and a comparable fully actuated two-degrees-of-freedom robot is presented, mainly focusing on the performances in terms of trajectories, actuator torques, and vibrations. The under-actuated system is composed of two active rotational joints followed by a passive rotational joint equipped with a torsional spring. The fully actuated robot is inertial equivalent to the under-actuated manipulator: the last link is equal to the sum of the last two links of the under-actuated system. Due to the conditions on the inertia distribution and spring placement, in a simple point-to-point movement the last passive joint starts and ends in a zero-value configuration, so the three DOF robot is equivalent, in terms of initial and final configuration, to the two DOF fully actuated robot, thus they can be compared. Results show how while the fully actuated robot is better in terms of reliable trajectory and actuator torques, the under-actuated robot wins in flexibility and in vibrations at a given configuration.

Read More

Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics Open Issues